1601 E. 5th St. #109

Austin, Texas 78702

United States


Module 002/2, Ground Floor, Tidel Park

Elcosez, Aerodome Post

Coimbatore, 641014 India


138G Grays Hill

Opp. BSNL GM Office, Sims Park

Coonoor, Tamil Nadu 643101 India

News & Insights

News & Insights

Crowdsourced v. User-Generated

Large media companies are moving away from paying in-house staff to create proprietary online content and favoring two lower-cost models for content creation — user-generated content (UGC) and crowdsourcing-generated content (CGC). Since these two approaches are often confused with each other, it’s worth looking more closely at the real differences between them.

UGC is just that: ancillary content (ratings, reviews, etc.) provided free of charge to content-driven sites by users. CGC is where paid crowd workers create the core information product itself. [When users supply content for free through user polls, contests, etc., this is often described as crowdsourced. It’s more accurately called UGC.]

So which approach is “better”? Well, they each have their benefits and drawbacks.

UGC appears to be “free,” but it carries substantial costs for curation via filters, editors, and/or moderators because:

  • Users exaggerate or are simply dishonest
  • People are more apt to write about negative experiences than positive ones
  • Users often violate copyright laws

Well-known commercial examples of UGC include:

  • Yelp, where users post their experiences and opinions about retail stores, services, and restaurants.
  • Local news sites where citizens with mobile phones post photos of a local events for republication.
  • LinkedIn, where users write content about themselves that often reflects only their positive qualities.

CGC is often cheaper than in-house content creation, but its costs are often wildly underestimated. Some of these costs include:

  • Highly specialized training and credentialing before a project starts
  • Sub-routines to ensure consistent quality (i.e., editorial/QA reviews)
  • Moderators to prevent dissemination of inappropriate content
  • Software to prevent “gaming the system” in various ways
  • An experienced crowdsourcing manager to design processes and to train and qualify a group of crowd workers exactly suited for the specific task at hand.

The choice between the potentially unwieldy crowd or amateur user-generated content can be tricky. One thing’s for sure, though. Content creation still requires managers who can handle complex information processes, even if the content’s provenance is out-of-house.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Keep on top of the information industry 
with our ‘Data Content Best Practices’ newsletter:

Keep on top of the information industry with our ‘Data Content Best Practices’ newsletter: